yoo hoo

Military Interrogation of Alien Unlawful Combatants 

The President's Commander-in-Chief Authority 

achieved an unprecedented level of destruction.

capture and interrogation of al Qaeda operatives is imperative to our national security and defense

President with the primary responsibility, and therefore the power, to protect the security of the United States

Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause is inapplicable to the conduct of interrogations of alien enemy.combatants

Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause "was designed to protect those convicted of crimes.

we will not read a statute to create constitutional problems 

customary intemational law cannot impose a standard that differs from U.S. obligations.

customary international law is not federal law and that the President is free to override it at his discretion.

snow steps

sssssssssss

glory

glogloglogloglo

bankrupt

bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

blocks

bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

петеу

                           after Serhiy Viktorovych Zhadan Сергі́й Ві́кторович Жада́н

specimen go rod bone doe nasty rock
gosling colostomy dove block
chemo lost mass Moroccan
nosh odd sleek touch vague omnibus
leek rest amen

specimen shove eagle god to dish of
cockle smear drive nib ditch chive
rick lock smear drive lean even ocean
leech channel meet you
gnaw shocker rock

evening salamander civility  Saran wrap
classic dictator
mean sleet cola trash neat
sonar veal man travel

daub log leech all chance
call griefs cleanex load veer


http://poetyka.uazone.net/default/pages.phtml?place=zhadan&page=zhadan01

a talk with matisse

tttttttttttttttttttttttt

Lindsay Lohan grew up

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

stapler says ouch

ssssssssssssssssssssss

Heavy Bonnet

hbhbhbhbhbhbhb

Rubén Salazar

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Ajax

  aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 

Lips moving

we're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.

if there's a 1% chance, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response.

But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.

the United States will not retreat from the world, and we will never surrender to evil.

the president is authorized to use the armed forces to defend the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq.

The Park Service should be ashamed of themselves

the fact that there are about 12 million illegal aliens in the USA who could vote without proper identification in place.

Sometimes we use remotely piloted aircraft to conduct targeted strikes against specific al Qaeda terrorists in order to prevent attacks on the United States and to save American lives

I'm not surprised the Pulitzer committee gave the Washington Post a prize for pursuing a sensationalist story, even when the story is a disaster for its own country.

My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government.

parable

question time

• Where are we?
• What are we doing here?
• Where are we going?
• Who are we writing for?
• What is the experience of the reader?
• Where are the leaders of the land?
• Where are the swells who run the show?
• Are we sleepwalkers or zombies?
• Are we vampires or werewolves?
• What comfort have we given?
• When is the rebirth of wonder?
• Where did imagination go?
• Why was it replaced by fear?
• Why dread the inevitable?
• Is it because it's all about us?

the polar vortex froze my cortex

regrets like lemons

rerererererere

Anacreon

            drink with me to days gone by

pourpourpour

Carnot Cycle

  carcarcarcar

poem wrote me

memememememe

i will die

diediediedie

Nottoway

notnotnotnotnotnot

window

winwinwinwinwinwin

pressure cooker

prepreprepreprepre

claire de lune

clclclcl

charm

chchchchchchchchchch

Ursa

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Woodlawn Road

the united states of america, by and through its attorneys, neil h macbride, united states attorney and andrew c herrold special assistant united states attorney, hereby submits this pretrial memorandum and states as follows. the defendant is charged with reentering the fort belvoir military installation after having removed therefrom and ordered not to reenter by the former fort belvoir installation commander in violation of title 18 united states code section 1382.

the trial memorandum is submitted pursuant to a request by the honorable john f anderson that the parties submit a memorandum to the court outlining what they believe to be the relevant legal issues in this case. the government contends that the issues are quite simple, and that in addition to proving that the defendant was on fort belvoir after having been removed and ordered not to reenter the government must prove that the united states has the requisite jurisidiction and ownership or possession of the highway in question. united states v, watson 80 f supp 649 e.d. va 1948 at 651

the united states expects the evidence to show that on november 1, 2007 defendant was ordered not to reenter the limits of the united states military reservation of fort belvoir virginia by former fort belvoir instalation commander brian lauristzen colonel u.s. army. on may 15, 2010 at approximately 3:15 p.m. officer thomas of the fort belvior police department observed defendant walking on woodlawn road within the confines of fort belvoir military installation. officer thomas recognised defendant from previous encounters defendant was cited and removed from fort belvoir. the united states expects the evidence to show that in 1944 the united states conveyed to the commonwealth of virginia an easement for a public road over what is now known as woodlawn road.

woodlawn road was used as a public road until shortly after the terrorist attacks of september 11 2001 at which time the road was closed to public travel. the united states and the commonwealth of virginia negotiated the construction of a road that will traverse fort belvoir and will serve as an alternative to woodlawn road. the new road will be open to public travel when it is complete. according to united states v. watson 80 f supp 649 d.c. va 1948 sole ownership or possession as against the accused had to be in the united states or there was no trespass within the meaning of 18 usc 1382 as noted above since shortly after september 11, 2001

woodlawn road has been in the sole possession of the united states large gates extend across the fort belvoir access points of woodlawn road and no trespassing signs are posted at the gate areas in watson the operator of a vehicle was charged with violating 18 usc 1382 after he drove his car onto a road that traversed marine corps base quantico in quantico virginia the road on which the defendant operated his vehicle was a public or county road for access to quantico and the public continued to use it in going to and from quantico. importantly, the road on which the defendant in watson was travelling was the only route that allowed public access to the town of quantico. because marine corps base quantico surrounded the town of quantico the town was completely cut off from the access to highway no 1 and indeed from the rest of virginia by land save for the county or public road which had become fuller road.

in this case woodlawn road is not open to the public to the public public traffic is not allowed on woodlawn road and as noted above access to woodlawn road is blocked and no trespassing signs exist. there is no way that the defendant could mistake the fort belvoir portion of woodlawn road as indistinguishable from a public street as described in united states v. albertini 472 us 675 1985 at 686 citing united states v. flower 407 us 197 (1972) furthermore the closure of woodlawn road did not completely block access to a town or piece of land that lies within the boundries of fort belvoir but that is unrelated to fort belvoir as the closure did in watson. motorists or pedestrians are able to reach the opposite side of fort belvoir by traveling around its boundries.

 the commonwealth of virginia has made no claim against the united states to enforce the easement in the ten years since it has been closed the commonwealth has apparantly acquiesced in the united states decision to block access to woodlawn the commonwealth has worked with the united states to develop a replacement to woodlawn road that will be open to public travel the government believes that united states v watson properly addresses what the united states must prove to be successful in the case against the defendant